Why Epistemology Can ’ t be Operationalized
نویسنده
چکیده
Operational epistemology is, to a first approximation, the attempt to provide cognitive rules such that one is in principle always in a position to know whether one is complying with them. In Knowledge and its Limits, I argue that the only such rules are trivial ones. In this paper, I generalize the argument in several ways to more thoroughly probabilistic settings, in order to show that it does not merely demonstrate some oddity of the folk epistemological conception of knowledge. Some of the generalizations involve a formal semantic framework for treating epistemic probabilities of epistemic probabilities and expectations of expectations. The upshot is that operational epistemology cannot work, and that knowledge-based epistemology has the right characteristics to avoid its problems.
منابع مشابه
A Comparison between Practical Epistemology Analysis and Some Schools in French Didactics
The aim of this article is to introduce the Swedish approach Practical Epistemology Analysis to the French community of comparative didactics, and to compare it to two major schools in French didactics to see how they are compatible and could draw on each other. This is made with an empirical emphasis, examining how the theoretical constructs can be operationalized to examine classroom interact...
متن کاملA Pragmatic Solution to the Value Problem of Knowledge
We value possessing knowledge more than true belief. Both someone with knowledge and someone with a true belief possess the correct answer to a question. Why is knowledge more valuable than true belief if both contain the correct answer? I examine the philosophy of American pragmatist John Dewey and then I offer a novel solution to this question often called the value problem of knowledge. I pr...
متن کاملSystems - Oriented Social Epistemology *
How can social epistemology (SE) be characterized so that all of these topics fit under its umbrella? Why does each topic qualify as epistemology and in what respects is it social? This paper begins by proposing a tripartite division of SE. Under this classification scheme the first variety of SE is highly continuous with traditional epistemology, whereas the second and third varieties diverge ...
متن کاملThe Epistemology of Modality 2 and the Epistemology of Mathematics 3
In this paper I explore some connections between the epistemology of modality and 6 the epistemology of mathematics, and argue that they have far more in common than 7 it may initially seem to be the case—even though modality need not (in fact, should 8 not) be characterized in terms of possible worlds (as the modal realist insists) and 9 mathematics need not (in fact, should not) be understood...
متن کاملThe Epistemology of Modality and the Epistemology of Mathematics
In this paper I explore some connections between the epistemology of modality and the epistemology of mathematics, and argue that they have far more in common than it may initially seem to be the case—even though modality need not (in fact, should not) be characterized in terms of possible worlds (as the modal realist insists) and mathematics need not (in fact, should not) be understood in term...
متن کامل